Updates to demos
This commit is contained in:
@ -12,19 +12,16 @@ not_TC? = t (t (t t) (t t t)) (t t (t t t))
|
||||
|
||||
-- /demos/toSource.tri contains an explanation of `triage`
|
||||
demo_triage = a b c : t (t a b) c
|
||||
demo_matchBool = (ot of : demo_triage
|
||||
of
|
||||
(_ : ot)
|
||||
(_ _ : ot)
|
||||
)
|
||||
demo_matchBool = a b : demo_triage b (_ : a) (_ _ : a)
|
||||
|
||||
-- Lambda representation of the Boolean `not` function
|
||||
not_Lambda? = demo_matchBool demo_false demo_true
|
||||
|
||||
-- Since tricu eliminates Lambda terms to SKI combinators, the tree form of many
|
||||
-- As tricu eliminates Lambda terms to SKI combinators, the tree form of many
|
||||
-- functions defined via Lambda terms are larger than the most efficient TC
|
||||
-- representation. Between different languages that evaluate to tree calculus
|
||||
-- terms, the exact implementation of Lambda elimination may differ and lead
|
||||
-- to different tree representations even if they share extensional behavior.
|
||||
-- representation possible. Between different languages that evaluate to tree
|
||||
-- calculus terms, the exact implementation of Lambda elimination may differ
|
||||
-- and lead to different trees even if they share extensional behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
-- Let's see if these are the same:
|
||||
lambdaEqualsTC = equal? not_TC? not_Lambda?
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user